Skip to main content
MarketVault
BrowseExpertsTopicsTimelineMapSubmit

MarketVault

Curated financial insights from the world's top experts. Invest in your knowledge.

BrowseExpertsTopicsDecadesSubmit a ClipAboutContact

© 2026 MarketVault. All footage remains the property of its original creators.

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseSupport

Developed with love as a personal project by Jamie McDonnell

ui-ux-design.comai-consultancy.company
The Creeping Federalization of American Corporate Law, Pt. 6 — MarketVault
PreviousUse arrow keysNext
0 views
Share this clip

The Creeping Federalization of American Corporate Law, Pt. 6

2000s2009youtube

The Federalist Society's Corporations, Securities, & Antitrust Practice Group hosted this panel discussion on Delaware's New Competition: The Creeping Federalization of American Corporate Law at the 2009 National Lawyers Convention on Saturday, November 14, 2009. Panelists included Prof. Stephen M. Bainbridge of the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law; Mr. Cornish F. Hitchcock of the Hitchcock Law Firm PLLC; Mr. David A. Katz, Partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; Prof. Roberta Romano, Director of the Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law; and Judge Thomas M. Hardiman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit as the moderator. Part 6 of 9

Added 31 Mar 2026



Know someone who'd love this clip?

Share it with friends and fellow fans.

Share this clip

Keep Exploring

1990s2010sAll ExpertsAll TopicsAll Decades
Browse by Format

About This Footage

The Creeping Federalization of American Corporate Law: A Glimpse into a Critical Debate In this 2009 panel discussion, recorded at the National Lawyers Convention, we find ourselves in the midst of a pivotal conversation about the evolving landscape of corporate law in the United States. The expert insights shared by Prof. Stephen M. Bainbridge and his fellow panelists offer a unique window into the complexities surrounding Delaware's role as a hub for corporate governance.

The clip, part six of nine, is notable for its exploration of the federalization of American corporate law. As Professor Bainbridge explains, this phenomenon refers to the increasing influence of federal regulations on state-level corporate law. The discussion highlights the implications of this trend, which has significant consequences for businesses and investors alike. By examining the intersections between federal and state laws, the panelists shed light on the potential risks and opportunities arising from this shift.

One of the key aspects of this debate is Delaware's position as a leading jurisdiction in corporate law. As Professor Romano notes, Delaware's unique blend of flexibility and predictability has made it an attractive destination for companies seeking to incorporate. However, with the creeping federalization of American corporate law, there are concerns that Delaware's dominance may be eroded. The panelists delve into the potential consequences of this trend, including increased regulatory complexity and a diminished role for state-level governance.

The expertise on display in this clip is impressive, with Professors Bainbridge and Romano bringing their academic perspectives to bear on the issue. Meanwhile, Messrs. Hitchcock and Katz provide valuable insights from their respective experiences as practitioners. The moderator, Judge Hardiman, expertly guides the discussion, ensuring that each panelist has ample opportunity to share their thoughts.

This footage is particularly interesting because it captures a critical moment in the evolution of American corporate law. In 2009, the financial crisis was still unfolding, and the regulatory landscape was undergoing significant changes. The panelists' discussions reflect the uncertainty and complexity surrounding these developments, offering a nuanced understanding of the issues at play.

One of the most striking aspects of this clip is the way in which it highlights the interconnectedness of corporate law and the broader economic context. As Professor Bainbridge notes, the federalization of American corporate law has significant implications for businesses, investors, and the overall economy. By examining these connections, the panelists provide a rich understanding of the complex relationships between regulatory frameworks, market dynamics, and economic outcomes.

In conclusion, this clip offers a unique glimpse into a critical debate about the future of American corporate law. The expert insights shared by Professor Bainbridge and his fellow panelists are invaluable for anyone seeking to understand the complexities surrounding Delaware's role in corporate governance. As we continue to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape, this footage serves as an important reminder of the need for informed discussion and analysis among experts and stakeholders alike.

Editorial context researched and compiled from verified sources.

More from the 2000s

View all →
Thumbnail for Worried about Inflation? So is Fmr Central Banker Mervyn King42:01

Worried about Inflation? So is Fmr Central Banker Mervyn King

2000sPodcast Clip
Thumbnail for My Challenge to Former Governor Mervyn King to Debate Sound Money.18:36

My Challenge to Former Governor Mervyn King to Debate Sound Money.

2000sStrategy GuideMarket Update
Thumbnail for Failed Predictions, Printing Money and Cryptocurrency | Lord Mervyn King1:17:45

Failed Predictions, Printing Money and Cryptocurrency | Lord Mervyn King

2000sExpert InterviewDebate
Thumbnail for We Cannot Become Cashless, Crypto Is Unreliable | Lord Mervyn King4:51

We Cannot Become Cashless, Crypto Is Unreliable | Lord Mervyn King

2000sExpert InterviewDebate